Ignoring referral relationships
Physician referrals are the backbone of PT demand. Clinics that market only to consumers and neglect referring providers leave the steadiest source of patients untapped.
/benchmarks/physical-therapy-marketing · BENCHMARK LIBRARY
Physical therapy value lives in the plan of care, not the first visit. A new patient typically means a course of treatment across weeks, so acquisition cost is small against the episode value. Public PT-specific data is thin, so grade against your own numbers and lean on referrals.
No website yet? Book a 30-minute conversation
How we vet every number
Names its source and date
Four confidence tiers
Against the primary source
Re-verified yearly
The short answer
Physical therapy marketing is how a clinic attracts patients and referral sources and retains them through a plan of care via local search, reviews, and physician and community relationships. In 2026 a new PT patient costs roughly $69 to $274 CAD to acquire against a multi-visit episode, so referral relationships and completion of care drive the economics.
The numbers
US market data, shown in CAD (converted from USD). Google Ads figures are medians. Compare against the all-industry averages on the benchmark library home.
| Benchmark | 2026 · CAD | Confidence | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost per new patient | $68.50-$274 | Directional | Digital channels $50-$100. |
| Average treatment value | $151-$171 | Directional | Per visit; a plan of care spans many visits. |
| Net margin | 10-20% | Directional | |
| Retention, top performers | 80-88% | Directional | |
| Marketing, % of revenue | 7-10% | Directional | For growth. |
New-year activity and injury-recovery demand lift intake; sports seasons drive rehab referrals year-round.
Beneath the average
Physical therapy is a per-session, course-of-care business. The initial evaluation opens a 6-to-8-week treatment plan, and cash-pay is a growing share. Here is the range by service, in CAD.
| Service | Typical job value | Gross margin | Buyer intent | Est. cost per lead | Demand | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial evaluation | $206-$480 | — | Considered | — | Stable | Strong data |
| Standard session (45-60 min) 2-3 visits a week over 6-8 weeks; copay $20-$75. | $103-$274 | — | Planned | — | Stable | Strong data |
| Pelvic-floor / specialized session | $164-$274 | — | Considered | — | Growing | Directional |
| Cash-pay / self-pay session The independent-clinic cash rate. | $103-$164 | — | Planned | — | Growing | Directional |
Job values and gross margins are North American homeowner figures from cost databases and industry sources, converted to CAD; service-level lead costs, where shown, come from aggregated campaign datasets. Ranges, not guarantees — overlay your own local market and cost per sale. Full attribution below.
The playbook
Physicians, surgeons, and specialists send a steady stream of rehab patients. Relationships with referring providers are the highest-value, lowest-cost channel in PT, and worth more sustained effort than any ad campaign.
Value is in the full episode, not the first visit at $151 to $171 CAD. Reducing early dropout, through scheduling, reminders, and a strong patient experience, raises revenue per patient more than acquiring new ones.
Where direct access allows, patients search for a PT clinic themselves. A complete Google Business Profile and steady reviews capture that high-intent demand and complement the referral engine.
What to run
Physical therapy wins on a no-risk screening plus the reminder that patients can come without a referral. Speed to an appointment is a real differentiator in a scheduling-constrained category.
A no-risk entry that surfaces treatable issues and starts the plan of care.
Removes the barrier for cash-based and direct-access patients.
Many patients do not know they can come without a doctor's referral, so say it plainly.
Speed to care is a differentiator when competitors book weeks out.
The operating system
PT is dominated by WebPT, the 800-pound gorilla of rehab EMR, with Jane the strong cash-based and small-practice challenger.
| Platform | What it is | Pricing | Position | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WebPT | Dominant PT EMR 155,000+ therapists across 27,000+ clinics; Best in KLAS 2024 | From ~$99 per month, higher tiers custom | Leader | Strong data |
| Jane (Jane App) | Cloud EMR for small and cash-based practices | ~$54 per month | Challenger | Directional |
| Prompt / Raintree | Modern and enterprise PT platforms | Quote-only | Enterprise | Limited data |
Quote-only figures are credible third-party estimates, not vendor-confirmed prices; add-ons, per-user fees and implementation costs routinely push real cost above sticker. Software share and pricing move fast, so this layer is re-checked more often than the annual benchmark cycle.
Where the money leaks
Physician referrals are the backbone of PT demand. Clinics that market only to consumers and neglect referring providers leave the steadiest source of patients untapped.
A patient who quits after two visits realizes a fraction of the episode value. Retention and completion of care move revenue more than new acquisition.
PT-specific public data is limited and often buried in broad healthcare figures. Treat the ranges as directional and grade against your own patient economics.
Read this first
Attribution
Last updated: July 7, 2026. Re-verified annually against primary sources. Read the methodology.
Questions
A new PT patient costs roughly $69 to $274 CAD, with digital channels at the lower end. Because a plan of care spans many visits at $151 to $171 CAD each, that acquisition cost is small against the full episode value, so completion of care matters most.
Physician and specialist referral relationships are the highest-value channel, backed by local search and reviews where direct access lets patients self-refer. The referral engine plus strong retention outperforms consumer advertising alone.
PT-specific figures are thin and often folded into broad healthcare benchmarks, and much of what exists comes from agencies. That is why we present the numbers as directional and recommend grading against your own cost per patient and plan-of-care completion.